A cream and white baroque pearl weighing 10.27 ct (figure 1) was recently submitted with seven other pearls to the Bangkok laboratory for a GIA Quality Assurance Report, which provides rapid identification for sorting purposes. The pearl appeared to have been assembled, as it possessed an odd translucent ring at one end, indicating where separate components had been joined together.
Prior to examination with real-time microradiography, it seemed likely that a shell bead nucleus was hidden from view, as the banded structure of a shell was observed in the translucent area when viewed with transmitted light from a fiber-optic light source. The transparent bonding agent used to join the two parts also contained black impurities (figure 2, left). Obvious gas bubbles were visible with a loupe or gemological microscope. Out of scientific interest, the pearl was also examined with X-ray fluorescence and DiamondView imaging. X-ray fluorescence showed a strong reaction in the damaged and repaired area, as would be expected because of its thinner nacre coverage. DiamondView imaging revealed the banding within the bead, the dark inclusions in the bonding agent, and the bonding agent itself (figure 2, right).
Real-time microradiography revealed the bead nucleus as well as an extremely thin nacreous cap that had been used to cover the damaged bead. While X-ray computed microtomography (μ-CT) would not normally be needed to identify such an obviously bead-nucleated pearl, it was used to display the results with even greater clarity (figure 3). This analytical technique clearly showed the broken bead and an area where a new piece of nacre had been applied to repair the pearl. This would explain the mismatching translucent ring.
This study demonstrated how the internal secrets of pearls can be revealed by a variety of techniques.
A cream and white baroque pearl weighing 10.27 ct (figure 1) was recently submitted with seven other pearls to the Bangkok laboratory for a GIA Quality Assurance Report, which provides rapid identification for sorting purposes. The pearl appeared to have been assembled, as it possessed an odd translucent ring at one end, indicating where separate components had been joined together.
Prior to examination with real-time microradiography, it seemed likely that a shell bead nucleus was hidden from view, as the banded structure of a shell was observed in the translucent area when viewed with transmitted light from a fiber-optic light source. The transparent bonding agent used to join the two parts also contained black impurities (figure 2, left). Obvious gas bubbles were visible with a loupe or gemological microscope. Out of scientific interest, the pearl was also examined with X-ray fluorescence and DiamondView imaging. X-ray fluorescence showed a strong reaction in the damaged and repaired area, as would be expected because of its thinner nacre coverage. DiamondView imaging revealed the banding within the bead, the dark inclusions in the bonding agent, and the bonding agent itself (figure 2, right).
Real-time microradiography revealed the bead nucleus as well as an extremely thin nacreous cap that had been used to cover the damaged bead. While X-ray computed microtomography (μ-CT) would not normally be needed to identify such an obviously bead-nucleated pearl, it was used to display the results with even greater clarity (figure 3). This analytical technique clearly showed the broken bead and an area where a new piece of nacre had been applied to repair the pearl. This would explain the mismatching translucent ring.
This study demonstrated how the internal secrets of pearls can be revealed by a variety of techniques.
